| 3,328 | 225 | 190 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
本文质疑了把我国传统村落的形态看作是社会和空间之间的结构简单对应的通常观点。通过应用空间句法(Space Syntax)的理论和分析方法,本文对比研究了一组徽州村落在空间组织方面的异同及其与宗族的社会形态和经济结构之间的关联。社会和空间的动态关系显示了宗法制度和其他多种社会力量在村落发展演变中的交织作用。在这种动态关系的作用之下,祠堂和店铺等公共建筑趋向于在村落的特定地段分布和聚集;村落呈现与其社会功能相适应的形态结构,并通过祠堂在空间组构关系上的等级来微妙地体现宗族社会的血缘秩序和社会关系。
Abstract：This paper challenges the commonly accepted correspondence model of village space structure in China, a simple view that sees settlement layouts of traditional vernacular villages were ordered according to the social hierarchy of lineage organization.By adopting space syn- tax theories and methods,the study compares the mor- phological patterns of a group of vernacular villages in Huizhou.The major objective is to retrieve configurational regularities among these villages in relation to the tradi- tional ideological influences and other social and economic forces.The analysis reveals that village layout configuration was driven by the spatial and social interrelations in which the patterning of village integration structures tended to absorb discrete local patterns created by lineage segmentation.This resulted in a phenomenon that public spaces like ancestral halls and shops attempted to concen- trate on the most accessible as well as certain strategically vantage locations during village growth and evolution.The morphological structure of a village in turn seemed to sustain its social and functional requirements,and subtly reflected the consanguine as well as social hierarchy of ancestral halls through their different degrees of integration,
[1]关于宗族村落的社会和空间结构之间的对应关系的论述见于诸多的论文和专著。具体请参见：董卫．《宗法制度对徽州传统村落结构及形态的影响》．东南大学硕士论文1986：沈克宁：“富阳县龙门村聚落结构形态与社会组织”，《建筑学报》1992(2) 53～58页；余英：《中国东南系建筑区系类型研究》．中国建筑工业出版社．2002，张十庆：《明清徽州传统村落初探》，东南大学硕士学位论文．1984。
[2]赵华富：《徽州宗族研究》，合肥：安徽大学出版社．2004。530-565页566-599页。
[3]胡星明：《递村祠堂寺庙庵堂书院一览》(手抄本)。
[4]赵华富：《徽州宗族研究》．合肥．安徽大学出版社．2004。
[5]龚恺．《徽州古建筑丛书-瞻淇》南京：东南大学出版社1996。
[6]龚恺．《徽州古建筑丛书-渔梁》南京．东南大学出版社1998。
[7]Ahem,Emily M.:1976,“Segmentation in Chinese Lineages:A View Through Written Genealogies”,American Ethnologist,3.1 (February 1976),pp.1-16o
[8]高寿仙：《徽州文化》．辽宁教育出版社1995 103～104页。
[9]Zurndorfer,Harriet T.:Change and Continuity in Chinese Local History-the Development of Hui-chou Prefecture 800 to 1800,Leiden: E.J.Brill,1989,pp.58.
[10]Hillier,B.& Hanson,J.:The Social Logic of Space,Cambridge: Cambridge Universily Press,1984:Hillier,B.:“The Architecture of the Urban Object”,Ekistiks (334/335),1989.pp.5-21;Hillier,B.:Space is the Machine:a configurational theory of architecture.Cambridge: Cambridge Unlversity Press，1996。中文关于空间句法的介绍及其在研究中的应用请见：张愚．王建国：“再论空间句法．《建筑师》第109期．33-44页。朱剑飞：“天朝沙场-清故宫及北京的政治空间构成纲要．《建筑师》第74期，101-112页。《世界建筑》2005年第11期空间句法专集。
[11]钱杭：《中国宗法制度新探》．中华书局．1994．186- 194页。另见冯尔康：《中国古代的祠堂与宗族》．商务印书馆．1998．91～102页．
[12]Hillier,B.:“Centrality as process:accounting for attraction inequality in deformed grids”,Urban Design International 1999(4):pp 107-127.
[13]Hillier,B.:“A theory of the city as object:or,how spatial laws mediate the social construction of urban space”,Urban Design Interna- tional 2002 (7):pp.153-179
[14]Foucauit,M.:Discipline and Punish:The Birth of the Prision, Vintage:New York,1979.
[15]汪善均：《宏村逸事补遗录》，1892(清末刻本)。
基本信息:
中图分类号:TU984
引用信息:
[1]王浩锋.社会功能和空间的动态关系与徽州传统村落的形态演变[J].建筑师,2008,No.132(02):23-30.
2008-04-20
2008-04-20