| 86 | 0 | 107 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
无障碍环境是城市与建筑设计的重要组成部分，是衡量社会文明与人民福祉的标尺。面向未来大规模的城市更新品质提升工作，建立精细化的分级评价标准，有助于无障碍环境建设的循序渐进与落地实施。许多发达国家对无障碍环境评价标准的探索起步较早，目前已形成完善的体系。本文系统梳理了我国分级评价标准的发展历程，指出我国历经“应宜可”、全文强制规范的阶段，正逐步试点量化分级评价，但仍缺少精细化的标准与落地实施体系，亟须参考国际经验。在此基础上，选取了新加坡、加拿大、美国三个典型发达国家的评价体系进行对比分析。基于国际经验，本文探讨了我国无障碍环境分级评价标准的完善方向—分级激励、动态评级、指标精细化，以促进无障碍环境提质积极性、覆盖全生命周期优化、降低落地难度，实现我国无障碍环境建设的高质量发展。
Abstract：An accessible environment is an essential component of urban and architectural design and a key indicator of social civilization and people's well-being. For the large-scale urban renewal and quality improvement initiatives underway,the establishment of refined graded evaluation standards is conducive to the progressive and implementable development of accessible environments. Developed countries have engaged in the exploration of accessible environment evaluation standards for a long time and have now formed mature and comprehensive standard systems. This paper systematically reviews the development process of China's graded evaluation standards,noting that the country has gone through stages of “must,should,could” requirements and fully mandatory national codes,and is now piloting quantitative graded evaluation. However,there remains a lack of refined standards and effective implementation systems,making it urgent to draw on international experience. On this basis,the evaluation systems of three developed countries,Singapore,Canada,and the United States,are comparatively analyzed. Drawing on international experience,this paper examines ways to improve China's graded evaluation standards for accessible environment,focusing on graded incentives,dynamic rating,and refined indicators. These measures aim to motivate quality improvement,support life-cycle optimization,reduce implementation difficulties,and promote the high-quality development of barrier-free environments in China.
[1]邓一凌，施伟芳，朱鹏辉，等.浙江省无障碍环境建设政策的对比分析与优化路径[J].城市学研究，2025(3):157-164.
[2]Nations U. Background|International Day of Persons with Disabilities[EB/OL].(2012-12-03)[2025-11-24]. https：//www.un.org/en/observances/day-ofpersons-with-disabilities/background.
[3]全国人民代表大会常务委员会.中华人民共和国无障碍环境建设法[Z]. 2023.
[4]崔轩，邵磊.中日无障碍环境建设相关法规体系对比分析[J].标准科学，2025(9):127-138.
[5]中华人民共和国建设部，中华人民共和国民政部，中国残疾人联合会.城市道路和建筑物无障碍设计规范：JGJ 50-2001[S].北京：中国建筑工业出版社，2001.
[6]陈刚，郑杰，郑志元.基于CiteSpace的我国无障碍环境研究进展与展望[J].西部人居环境学刊，2020,35(6):79-87.
[7]中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.关于深化工程建设标准化工作改革意见[Z].建标[2016]166号，2016.
[8]中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.关于发布国家标准《建筑与市政工程无障碍通用规范》的公告[Z].中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部公告2021年第174号，2021.
[9]深圳市无障碍环境促进会，深圳市无障碍城市联合会，深圳市标准化协会.无障碍城市（城区）评价标准：T/SZSACA 2-2021[S]. 2021.
[10]国家市场监督管理总局，中国残疾人联合会.关于印发《无障碍环境认证实施方案》的通知[Z].国市监认证[2022]94号，2022.
[11]T/CNCAEC 1304-2022民用建筑无障碍设施评价标准[S].北京：中国工程咨询协会，2022.
[12]南京市城乡建设委员会.对市政协十五届二次会议第0571号提案的答复[Z].南京：南京市城乡建设委员会，2024.
[13]Building and Construction Authorit y(BC A).Universal design guides[EB/OL].(2026-03-18)[2026-06-24].https：//www1.bca.gov.sg/home-andbuilding-owners/accessibility-and-universal-design/universal-design-guides/.
[14]Building and Construction Authorit y(BC A).Universal Design Guide for Public Places 2016[EB/OL].(2026-03-18)[2026-06-24].https：//www1.bca.gov.sg/home-and-building-owners/accessibilityand-universal-design/universal-design-guides/.
[15]Rick Hansen Foundation. Frequently asked questions about RHFAC[EB/OL].(2026-06-19)[2026-06-24]. https：//www.rickhansen.com/becomeaccessible/rating-certification/rhfac-faq.
[16]Rehabilitation Foundation. Guide to RHF Accessibility Certification[EB/OL].(2024-01-15)[2025-12-21]. https：//www. rickhansen.com/become-accessible/rating-certification/rhfac-v40.
[17]Rehabilitation Foundation. Guide to RHF accessibility certification[S]. 2024.
[18]Julie Sengl. Get certified in accessibility[EB/OL].(2022-01-12)[2025-11-23]. https：//www.sait.ca/news/2022/01/certified-in-accessibility.
[19]USGBC. SITES rating system and scorecard[EB/O L].(2026-06-07)[2026-06-24]. https：//www.usgbc.org/resources/sites-rating-system-and-scorecard.
[20]袁妮雅.基于sites可持续场地评估体系的城市景观评价研究—以上海市相关项目为例[D].苏州大学，2018.
[21]Wessel P. Incorporating SITES into sustainable landscape regulations[EB/OL].(2024-04-08)[2025-12-31]. https：//www.asla.org/news-insights/the-field/incorporating-sites-into-policy-andregulations.
[22]IRS. Tax benefits for businesses that accommodate people with disabilities|internal revenue service[EB/OL].(2024-10-29)[2026-06-22]. https：//www.irs.gov/newsroom/tax-benefits-for-businesses-thataccommodate-people-with-disabilities.
[23]SITES certification and sustainability for landscapes[EB/OL].(2024-01-10)[2026-06-22]. https：//support.usgbc.org/hc/en-us/articles/4 425464783891-SITES-cer tification-andsustainability-for-landscapes.
[24]Danielle Pieranunzi. SITES|developing sustainable landscapes[EB/OL].(2018-02-27)[2026-03-11]. https：//www.sustainable sites.org/site sright-tool-green-infrastructure.
[25]王春彧，周燕珉.发达国家住宅适老化改造的资金支持政策与实践概要[J].国际城市规划，2023,38(5):83-94.
[26]Internal Revenue Service(IRS). Tax benefits to help offset the cost of making businesses accessible to people with disabilities[EB/OL].(2023-05-11)[2026-03-11]. https：//www.irs.gov/zh-hans/newsroom/tax-benefits-to-help-offset-the-costof-making-businesses-accessible-to-people-withdisabilities.
[27]李振宇，朱怡晨.迈向共享建筑学[J].建筑学报，2017(12):60-65.
[28]中国残联维权部.十四届全国人大二次会议第3856号建议及办理复文[Z]. 2024.
[29]中国建筑标准设计研究院.无障碍设计：12J926[S].北京：中国计划出版社，2013.
[30]王小荣.无障碍意识认知与无障碍环境设计研究[J].建筑师，2013(4):75-79.
[31]王春彧，毛隆健，周燕珉.社区环境对老年人跌倒风险的影响：跨学科视角综述与讨论[J].建筑师，2025(6):43-50.
基本信息:
DOI：10.26934/j.jzs.20260320002
中图分类号:TU201;TU984.14
引用信息:
[1]王春彧,陈佳,章博鸿,等.从“应宜可”到精细化：国内外无障碍环境分级评价标准的发展与启示[J].建筑师().DOI:10.26934/j.jzs.20260320002.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金（52308010）; 高密度人居环境生态与节能教育部重点实验室开放基金（20240102）; 重庆大学教育教学改革研究项目（2024Y19）
2026-08-26
2026-08-26
2026-08-26